Survey Intelligence Platform
Pipeline Integrity Survey Platform
CIPS, DCVG and test-post survey review, comparison, smart recommendations, auto report generation and structured export in one pipeline integrity workspace built for recurring survey programs.
Pipeline Integrity Survey Platform is designed for teams that need more than raw survey files and static spreadsheets. It brings survey records, pipeline context, route visibility, comparison workflows and engineering review into one structured application used for recurring integrity programs.
Instead of treating analysis, recommendations, reporting and export as disconnected follow-up tasks, the platform keeps them inside the same workflow. Historical data stays available across survey cycles, so previous defects, earlier indications and changing conditions can be checked and compared before engineering decisions are made, giving teams more informed recommendation support from the data already in the system.
A mobile application is also available for field work. It can be used during the survey itself so data is entered directly in the field, linked to the route and captured with submeter GPS accuracy where the workflow requires it.
Core Capabilities
- Survey data ingestion, structuring and review-ready organization across repeated campaigns
- Comparative analysis across routes, sections, survey campaigns and historical defects
- Defect classification, smart recommendation support and action guidance
- Auto report generation, structured KML export and survey deliverable support
- Mobile survey data entry with submeter GPS-linked field capture workflows
Survey Review Workspace
Review mapped defects, survey potentials and defect distribution in one screen
The application gives engineers a working view of route geometry, survey potentials and defect concentration together, making it easier to see where the route is stable, where indications cluster and where deeper follow-up is needed. This is useful when teams need technical review that goes beyond static report pages.
- Mapped route review tied directly to survey values and defect classes
- Visual breakdown of findings for faster technical prioritization
- Practical workspace for recurring survey analysis instead of one-off report reading
Pipeline Context
Keep pipeline properties, route context and linked survey activity in the same system
Survey interpretation improves when route geometry, diameter, material, coating and related survey history are not scattered across separate files. The platform keeps that context attached to each pipeline so analysts can move from asset definition to survey evidence without losing continuity.
- Pipeline register linked to route information and survey history
- Geospatial route context available during technical review
- Cleaner handoff between pipeline data management and survey assessment
Survey Management
Manage survey campaigns, methods, sections and defect summaries in a structured workflow
CIPS, DCVG and test-post potential surveys can be defined, organized and reviewed with their schedule, methods, sections and defect breakdown kept in one place. That makes it easier to control recurring survey programs and maintain consistent structure across imported data from different contractors or reporting cycles.
- Survey setup with methods, timing, sections and notes in one record
- Consistent structure for imported survey datasets across campaigns
- Defect summaries kept close to the operational survey definition
Comparison & Recommendations
Compare survey runs, review previous defects and prepare stronger recommendations
The platform is built for the engineering work that happens after collection. Teams can compare survey runs, review how conditions change across sections and cycles, check previous defects against current findings, document recommendations and prepare outputs without manually rebuilding the same deliverables in separate tools. Because the system keeps survey history, defect behavior and route context connected, it can support smarter and more consistent recommendation workflows. Auto report generation and structured KML export make the workflow more repeatable and easier to hand over.
- Comparison of survey data across routes, sections and different survey dates
- Previous defects and historical indications checked against new survey evidence
- Smart recommendation workflows, auto report generation and structured KML export for downstream delivery